Mizuno MX-20 Irons
Mizuno MX-20 Irons
[May 09, 2003]
spikedog2
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX 20
I recently purchased a set of MX-20 with the Dynagold 300 stiff shafts. I tested all the major brands at a demo day and these felt the best. I have hit a few times at the range so far and played one round of golf, I previously played Hogan Apex blades from about 20 years ago. As far as length is concerned I might have added about 5 yards or so. The difference is in the forgiveness of the clubs. With my blades it would be much easier to hit thin shots off the Toe and lose 10-20 yards of distance. I would be tempted to club down often. A toe shot with the MX-20 might loses 5 yards of distance. Since I am not able to play that much and perfect my game to consistently hit the sweet spot, this has improved the consistency of my length and help offset thin shots. I considered the MP 30s and they felt good on the range but I am glad I chose the MX-20s. Until I am able to play more often the mx-20s will make my game better with a goal of breaking 80. Wish me luck, Mike Similar Products Used: Tested Apex edge plus, Ping I3 + Cleveland, ect |
[May 07, 2003]
Duffer
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX-20
A note for the high handicappers out there. I generally shoot in the high 90s, and was looking for a set of good clubs to replace the clones I’ve been playing with. Started off thinking about the TM RACs, Callaway x-16 and BB, Titleist 822s and the Clevelands. A salesman recommended I try the MX-20s: I thought he was nuts because I thought forged clubs were for “players,” not duffers like me. Omigod, was I wrong. I hit all the clubs listed below. The MX-20s were my first choice BY FAR. My common faults are hitting the ball fat and hooking the ball. I found that many “game improvement” irons exacerbated the problems, perhaps due to the amount of offset, thick heavy sole, etc. I had particular problems with the RACs (way left or fat city) and the BBs, the two models I initially was most interested in. Didn’t like the Pings either (felt like I was hitting rocks). The Titleists seemed way overpriced and I hit them left quite a bit. The CFTs were nice clubs, but the clear second place finishers were both Cleveland sets. The TA-5s were forgiving but a little high and short, the TA-7s less forgiving but pretty long and sweet feeling. Nice clubs. The MX-20s were head and shoulders above the rest though. I almost never hit them fat (I even have hit a few shots thin, a shocker for me). When you hit the sweet spot, it feels like butter. Unbelievable. Click. The trajectory is towering so they land soft, but the lofts are a tad strong so they gooooooooo… I hit each club about 15 yards longer than my old clubs, _and_ higher. They are very forgiving, too: heel and toe hits fly pretty straight with just some loss of distance. And a shocker for me: I could actually hit the 3 iron. I may pull the 7 wood out of my bag and put the 3 back in. I even could work the ball, hitting slight draws and fades by changing my stance. Not a big deal for many, but to have some control of that was a first for me. I certainly feel that I have tools that I can use now to work more seriously on different aspects of the game. Lastly, they are FUN to hit. When testing clubs, I had to force myself to put it down to move on to the others, especially with the novelty of shaping shots and stroking the 3 iron. So high handicappers out there, don’t sell yourself short. Try the MX-20s before you buy anything else. (Got a great deal from Midwest Discount Golf too: $480.) Customer Service No experience yet. Similar Products Used: Cleveland TA-7, TA-5; Mizuno MX-15; Taylor Made RAC; Titleist 822; Ping i3+; Hogan CFT; Callaway x-16, BB; Wilson Deep Red |
[May 02, 2003]
Teetime
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX-20 S300
Absolutely fabulous! First, the clubs are stunning. Mizuno makes nothing but the best looking clubs on the market. Second, the feel is remarkable. I had the Ping I3+ Blades and it felt like I was hitting a rock everytime I hit the golf ball. Needless to say, I subsequently sold the Ping's after just 2 months of play. The MX-20's allow you to feel the ball off the clubface and give instant feedback. Love it!! Finally, the consistency in witch these irons hit the ball is second to none. I consistently hit the 7-iron with these 155-160 vs 140-155 with the Ping's. You really feel like you have a game improvement club in your hand everytime you swing these irons. I just can't wait to get my handicap lower to be able to swing the MP-30's!! Customer Service Haven't had to deal with them - probably a good thing. Similar Products Used: Ping I3+ Blades |
[Apr 28, 2003]
Steve Duke
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX20 Irons
Previously had T-Zoid Pro's which were fine but maybe a little too demanding of my 13 handicap at times - had replaced 3-iron with Fli-Hi utility. Hit these on a Mizuno demo day and couldn't believe how solid they felt. Anyway, when demoing new clubs, tried Hogan CFT, Titleist CB's and new McGregors. These by far felt the best and gave the best results. Bought them straight away and am now getting straighter shots, more consistent results and an extra half-club of distance. Not so easy to curve the ball, but what's so bad about hitting it where you aim it?? AND I can use a 3 iron for the first time in my life!!! Customer Service Fine - Clubgolf had 20% discount over the Easter weekend and sorted out the right shaft/loft/lie. Similar Products Used: Mizuno T-Zoid Pro, Hogan Edge |
[Apr 25, 2003]
trigolfer
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX-20
These are a great set of irons. I had been playing the MP-14's for seven years and was ready for a little more forgiveness. These irons are longer than the 14's, with stronger lofts, and are so much easier to hit with the longer irons. I kept the 14's for so long because they are "players" cubs, but regret not getting the 20's earlier. They are so easy to hit and so forgiving that I am hitting 1-2 more greens in regulation, which computes into lower scores. The 7-14 handicaps that play blades because they want to groove their swing and find out when they hit a bad shot, will never score as well until they get some clubs were they can score better. Hell, even the pros are using more cavity backs and mixed sets to take advantage of technology with the longer irons. Try out a set on the 20's and you will be impressed. Customer Service Dan at discountdansgolf.com was great. Can get you what you need at a great price. Similar Products Used: Mizuno MP-14 |
[Apr 23, 2003]
Rainbow
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX-20
Excellent clubs. I bought them used. Forgiving but very playable. Used to play Titleist 762 and hit the ball a little fat. But MX-20 have good bounce at sole make them easier to take shallow divot. That mean cleaner contact. They feel sweet and 5-10 yards longer too. I have pure joy playing with them and no reason for me to play others. Similar Products Used: Callaway X-14, Titleist 762, Cleveland TA5 |
[Apr 15, 2003]
miyazu
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX20
Had a free lesson when buying the clubs, this helped sort out my swing. I find the Mizuno's easy to hit gaining 5 to 10 yards on my previous clubs. Accuracy is much better and you can feel the shot with the forged heads. Not too sure about the sand wedge (bought as an optional extra) I find is tends to dig in more than my previous club, especially if using on damp grass for chip shots. Given the chance again I would still buy the irons and buy a different sand/lob wedge. Customer Service no contact Similar Products Used: Callaway x14, callaway big bertha |
[Mar 29, 2003]
Mike
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mx-20
I thought that these clubs were excellent. I hit them at the driving range a few times and boy were they nice and sollid. I got the feel and the accuracy from these clubs. I really enjoyed these clubs and I dont think that I will be switching soon. Customer Service awesome |
[Mar 26, 2003]
mannington
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Mizuno MX-20
Best of all worlds? Forged feel takes a bit of adjusting especially after hitting a variety of cast heads over the years, but once you go forged it's tough to imagine playing anything else. Feedback is immediate and very informative; you will know without looking how the shot was hit, the ball flight, etc. Thin shots seem to be the most frequent result from a mis-hit. Blades have shot-shaping appeal to the scratch golfers out there and ego/purist appeal to everyone else, but most of us will definitely benefit from the cavity back and bottom-weighting. I'm glad they resisted the temptation to oversize the head. These seem ideal. Dynalite Gold shafts are a perfect match (for me, at least) - the S300 plays a bit soft compared to Dynamic Golds, but I much prefer the ball flight of the Dynalites. Customer Service Haven't dealt with them, but have heard good things generally. Similar Products Used: Ping Zing 2, Ping ISI-N (Nickel), MacGregor 1025C |
[Mar 24, 2003]
mapgolf
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
MX 20
Decided to replace my Mizuno Comp EZs. tried the full range of Pings, Callaways etc but these are expensive cast clubs. I was used to the feel of a forged head. Tried the MX 20 and without doubt they are easy to play and the feel on well hit shots is superb. My shots are 10 yards longer and the ball flight is perfect. These clubs have knocked 5-6 shots per round. Similar Products Used: Mizuno Comp EZ Callaway X12 Ping i-3 Wilson deep red |