Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Drivers
Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Drivers
[Jan 07, 2002]
Sean C
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Quadpro Ti
Strength:
None I tried several different drivers in my quest to find the "big stick" to help take me to the next level. I also tried different shafts. Amazingly, the stock Cleveland shaff in a stiff flex gave me more consistent performance than the bi-matrix and ust shafts. Amature golfers need to understand that not all equipment is for all golfers regardless of cost or ratings. Different equipment reacts to different swings differently. Its what''s better for YOU that counts. It took a salesman at Golf Galaxy who was more interested in me getting the right club for me as opposed to selling the one that cost the most to make me understand that because I was ready to spend a lot more for a club I hit a lot less consistently. At any rate, the Cleveland has a very solid feel at contact and is incredibly accurate. I''ve never seen anything like it. Let''s not even talk about the distance! I was out driving the comp. consistently. This club is very solid in all aspects. Very forgiving. Its nice to know that your ball will likely be in play when you pull out the driver instead of hoping its in play. Test this club if you are in the market for a driver. Similar Products Used: TM 320, Hawkeye VFT, Adams ST Driver |
[Jan 06, 2002]
FKR
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Driver
Strength:
None I first tried this driver back in March of 2001 at a demo days with Cleveland Golf and I loved it but did not buy it. BIG MISTAKE I bought a Titleist 975D for a $100.00 more and loved it some days and hated others. So I sold it and went back to a Callaway Biggest and hated that one more. I was in Edwin Watts here in Duluth, GA and saw the Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Driver in Excellent Condition marked at $79.99 what a deal. Went out today and play with this driver and hit the ball dead on LONG and STRIGHT for me that GREAT because I have a power fade not any more. Cleveland Golf should have done a better job promoting this driver. Customer Service GREAT! Similar Products Used: Callaway Biggest Big Bertha ,Callaway Steelhead Plus Driver ,Cleveland Launcher Titanium Driver ,Taylor Made 320Ti Series Driver ,Titleist 975D |
[Nov 28, 2001]
SHANNON
Shoots in the 90s
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None VERY LONG CLUB, HOWEVER MUST HIT IN SWEET SPOT. I FOUND THE CLUB TO BE VERY LONG HOWEVER NOT VERY FORGIVING. I ORDERED THE CLUB WITH A BIMATRX SHAFT WHICH SEEMED TOO STIFF FOR MY PLAY. CLUB ALSO HAS NO SOUND. I LIKE TO HEAR THE CLUB WHEN YOU HIT A GOOD TEE SHOT. THIS CLUB IS VERY QUITE. I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THE CLUB TO THE HIGHER HANDICAP PLAYER. EXCELLENT VALUE ON THE CLUB AT THIS TIME. PAID ONLY 159.00. I TRADED THE CLUB IN HOWEVER ON A BAZOOKA 320J, WHICH BY THE WAY IS LONGER AND MUCH EASIER TO HIT. Similar Products Used: CALLAWAY STEELHEAD PLUS, BAZOOKA 320J |
[Nov 25, 2001]
dukegolf
Scratch Golfer
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Quadpro Ti 8.5
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Just purchased this club after reading about all of the rave reviews. Paid $149 with the x-stiff Pro Force 65. Everything I''ve read was true. This club hits straight and long. It''s not as long as my TM360(7deg w/xstiff Graphalloy) but pretty close. I think it''s longer than the Launcher 8.5 that I have. But this is due to the fact the I hit the Launcher really high. The combination of carry and roll is longer with the Quadpro. This club is such a joy to hit and even though it has a 260cc head, it doesn''t feel like it. The club smacks the ball and launches it like a rocket on a mid/low trajectory. Dead straight. I have 2 loves now. The Taylor 360 and the Cleveland Quadpro Ti. Customer Service not used Similar Products Used: Ping TISI, 975J, 975D, 300S, Tec Ti, Callaway (all), Tzoid Pro Forged. |
[Nov 12, 2001]
dp4sc
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Ti QuadPro 10.5 Bimatrix Stiff
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None three words - buy this club! i actually read a ton of reviews on this site and went out and tested a lot of the drivers that were recommended. i have played a titleist 975d, callaway great big bertha, mizuno tzoid forged, etc. and nothing could be more of a game improvement club than this cleveland ti quadpro. the club is so easy to swing, straight and very long. it carries just like the others but the roll is what is amazing - not sure if the bimatrix has anything to do with it - but i am sold! do not buy this club with the standard cleveland graphite shaft - its way too flexible - go for the bimatrix, grafalloy or proforce upgrade. it is so worth the extra dough. the head has a traditional look at address - looks alot like the titleist 975 series - inspires confidence from the get go. the weight is perfect with the bimatrix shaft - you know where the head is at all times. the club is so easy to hit - mis-hits still fly real straight - little distance sacrificed but keeps you in the short stuff. i have always ran back to my gbb after purchasing/playing with a new driver. i am so confident in this driver that i pulled the gbb out of the bag and even bought the quadpro 16* dual rail fairway with the bimatrix shaft to replace my always faithful gbb 3 wood. i can not say enough about this stick...and the bimatrix shaft. i was a skeptic about the shaft but i hit it and would not trade this combo for anything. there is nothing like staring at a tight par 5 500 yard+ hole and reaching right in for the ti quad and having a shot at the green in 2! save your money on the titleist/callaway clubs for greens fees on a nice course and enjoy this club. thank you very much cleveland! Similar Products Used: Titleist 975, Callaway GBB / VFT, Mizuno, you name it. |
[Nov 11, 2001]
Ken Li
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
10.5 Bi-matrix regular
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Been looking for the "right" driver for a long time and recently purchased a Ping i3 -- which was the winner after a lot of testing (Ping, Callaways, and TMs). I tend to prefer smaller heads, so I opted for the i3 over the Tisi. Read great things about the Quadpro Ti, however, but wasn''t able to find anyone locally to demo it. On a recent trip to TX, found it at Golfsmith in both the OEM shaft, bi-matrix, and ProForce 65. Loved the look since it''s only 260cc vs. the super jumbo heads out there now. Fit and finish were spectacular as well. Spent about 2 hours in the simulator and ended up going with the bi-matrix in regular flex. The stock shaft seemed a bit soft, and I didn''t like the feel of the ProForce much. Plus, at 44" I was more consistent with the bi-matrix (vs. 45" for the regular and ProForce). I also really liked the way the bi-matrix felt, which was a bit odd for me considering that I had the bi-matrix in my i3 and it was WAY too stiff (so I reshafted it with Ping 350 regular). When I got the club home to CA, I took it to the range and it again hit great. I was glad the simulator results weren''t a fluke. But the real test was on the course. The first few times I pulled it out, I was at least 10-15yds past where I normally would hit my i3 on solid hits and maybe 20-25 yds further on mis-hits. Suffice it to say that I was hitting from parts of the fairway that I''ve never seen. This weekend against my buddies, I hit 11 of 14 fairways and was hitting my drives past them (something I normally don''t do). This thing is unique -- LONG and STRAIGHT and reasonably forgiving. If you''re a really high handicapper, you may want something ultra-forgiving like the Tisi. But if you''re a decent ball-striker, this driver is the best I''ve hit. Great club. Highly recommended. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: Ping i3 and Tisi, Callaway Steelhead Plus, Great Big Bertha, Big Bertha Warbird, TM Bubble |
[Nov 04, 2001]
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
quadpro ti 9.5 deg
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Get one while you still can........great value at close-out prices.....even better with bi-matrix shaft READ the recent Golf Digest article on sweet-spot size - - - the graphics show how large this club plays - - - "tennis racket" playability without the brick head hints - if you draw/hook - get the 9.5 - it has a slightly open face - you''ll hit it high straight - long but with little roll - faders get the 10.5 - its slightly closed - not as precise as my Titleist - but great for those day when you aren''t on Similar Products Used: Titleist 975D / 976R - Talyor 360, Cobra |
[Nov 01, 2001]
TA4
Shoots in the 100s
Model Reviewed:
Quadpro 9.5 w/Bimatrix
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Read the reviews, and went to Golfsmith to check the club out. All the hype is true, it''s straight, and long too. I''ve always fought a bad fade, but this club straightens all but the worst. I would recomend this driver to anyone with control problems the Bimatrix is the best. Customer Service none Similar Products Used: McHenry Metals,Adams SC,Intrega''s,Taylor Made''s, and others. |
[Oct 30, 2001]
lf911sc
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Driver
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Have been going to my local pro shop looking for the new Launcher for a few weeks. Since it wasn''t in I decided to hit other sticks while I was waiting. Last on my list was this "old" Cleveland. Tried it in all the available shaft options and couldn''t believe how straight and long I was hitting this driver with the Gafalloy ProLite 35 shaft, stiff flex. I was under the impression that this driver would lack a little in the distance department but I was hitting it as long as or further than the Mizunos, Titleists, Pings and TM''s of the world. And none of these could match the solid feel and sound that this club has to offer. The ball just cracks and explodes off the face. But the selling point was how straight I hit this club. Gone was the slice from some of my tee shots, replaced but a gentle fade on the rare occassion that I missed it. Didn''t originally purchase it after hitting it, still wanted to compare it to the Launcher. When they were down to one with the loft and shaft that I wanted I worried that someone else would grab it so I made the purchase. Beauty of it is that if I do decide to go on to the Launcher this driver is worth $120 on a trade, the price I paid! No risk buying at it''s best. Thing is, I don''t think that I will have to make the switch, even if the Launcher has more legs, I can''t see how it could be more accurate and there is no way that it will have the feel that this club has. Similar Products Used: TM, Titleist, Mizuno, Ping, Orlimar, et al |
[Oct 29, 2001]
Joe
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Quadpro Titanium Driver 9.5
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None I purchased this driver about two weeks ago. I have been a happy golfer since. My ball is going straighter and I am finding more fairways. This driver even got me 20 yards away from a 383 hole of course there was a downwind. I have crushed some drives and have shot the best game of my life with this driver. Similar Products Used: None |