Wilson Staff Di7 Irons
Wilson Staff Di7 Irons
[Jul 17, 2009]
skeurton
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Staff Di7
I'd been looking at the Di7's for a while, trying to decide between these and the Ci7's. I was previously using an old set of Wilson Head Speed clubs, which I grew to love. But it was just time for something new. I finally decided on the Di7's based on: 1) price (got them at Golf Galaxy on clearance for $130), and 2) the fact that these are truly game improvement clubs and I will take all the help I can get. Well, I've had them for about a month now, playing 3 or 4 times a week, and I couldn't be happier with my choice.
|
[Jul 16, 2009]
greg cain
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson D17
These clubs are the best bang for the buck. I must say I took a few rounds to get the feel of them, especially the gap wedge. Now I am extemely confident in the clubs. I do agrre with most reviews that you hit a club length longer than you would do with any other club.. This was the main reason it took me a while to get comfortable with them. Would buy them again in a minute |
[Jul 14, 2009]
b_walkem
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Di7 Irons
I, like many others bought this set of clubs at Golf Town for 228.00Cdn.
|
[Jul 14, 2009]
dees72
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Di7
I bought these as a first set of clubs. I did tons of research before hand, and frequented all of the local shops to try out everything I could. I kept coming back to these, but I didn't like the price. Eventually, I ran into a good deal and pulled the trigger. They are fairly easy to hit, have good feedback on good and bad shots, and feel good in my hands. I can't say you could find a better club for the money. I definitely recommend them for a new golfer or high handicapper. Customer Service Not used Similar Products Used: Rental clubs, Taylormade RAC OS, tried many other popular sets |
[Jun 24, 2009]
gstarr42
Shoots in the 100s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Staff Di7 Irons
Bought these clubs a week ago and have played 3 rounds since then. Also picked them up from Golftown (4-GW) for $228 Canadian on a whim and it is easily the best money I have ever spent on my golf game. For someone who has struggled to break 100 with any consistency, my first 3 rounds with these clubs have been 99, 96 and 88 (all on the same course I play all the time so it's an accurate depiction of play)!!
Customer Service Not used Similar Products Used: Ping G5s, Taylormade RAC, Callaway X-20s, Nickent 3DX |
[Jun 12, 2009]
kivwa
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Di7's
Picked these up at golftown more than 50% off ($228 canadian). I tried a bunch of clubs and lastly these caught my eye, mainly because of the price haha, but I gave them a few swings on the sim and was in awe, its like these clubs were designed for me, they outperformed bigger names and prices, the shot grouping was very tight, and they were crazy long, I hit the 7-iron 220 yards on the sim, bought them and brought them to the range immediately and had the same results, very high, longest clubs ever tried, and very accurate and straight. Cannot be any happier with these clubs especially at the price, I have the steel uniflex shafts. I was hitting the 4 iron as far as others were hitting there drivers on the course. TRY THEM AND BUY THEM!!! Similar Products Used: TM tour burners, cobra fp, nike slingshots, callaway x-20 |
[Jun 08, 2009]
Andy
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Staff Di7
I recently bought these clubs at Golf Galaxy for $133 and change. That was the first reason I bought them. The second reason was the fact that they just looked like the right clubs. Nice fat shaft with no hosel. They dropped my score from the 100's down to 93 at the best. The irons are so smooth and I am getting under every shot since they moved the CG down. Overall these clubs are worth the money and then some, my set was a Gap wedge through 4 iron. So if you have $150 laying around and you need a new set, I would highly recommend picking them up! |
[May 01, 2009]
jsrskr
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Di7
I have the steel shaft uniflex version, they are great. WOW!!! I play 75 times per year and currently carry a 6 handicap on my home course. These clubs are awesome! I switched from Wilson Deep Red II Tour Irons (which are great players clubs for the money) and absolutely love these irons. As others have said I am one club longer with these clubs. I have found the short irons to be extremely long and accurate. Length has never been my strength but now at age 52 I hit the pitching wedge about 125, 9 iron 135, 8 iron 145, you get the picture. I have found that nice smooth swings are greatly rewarded. My natural tendency is a slight draw and I have found that I hit these pretty much straight. But they go right where you aim them. Minor off sweet spot hits are still playable. Of course no clubs will help much with your really bad swings!! I was worried about hitting them too high as they do have a low center of gravity but I have found that I hit them only slightly higher and they have excellent trajectory. I highly recommend these clubs to any level of player. Good players are told you need to "work" the ball. Honestly, you are more likely to become a scratch golfer by hitting one shot pattern all the time and spend the time you would work on different shot patterns working on your short game. That is where Pros really are great, they get the ball in the hole with their wedges and putter. Wilson clubs are an absolute STEAL for the money, compared to the larger names! Buy them! I paid $200 for a 4-sw, 9 club set on ebay. Customer Service haven't needed Similar Products Used: Maltby Recoil, Wilson Deep Red II, Taylor Made Rac, Callaway x14s |
[Mar 12, 2009]
Rick
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
W/S Di7
I traded in my 4 yr old forged Mizuno's for the Di7 after reading so many reviews and I am a Sr Player. The difference is an expensive set has a swing wt of D2 w Di7 being D4. The degree of loft on each Di7 is one more club than the tour clubs. Where I was using a 9 iron, I use Di7 Pw, as an example. Or tour 5 iron vs Di7 6 iron for same distance. What I found and looking for was a straight ball which I am getting with the Di7. I bought my set May 2007 and have gotten used to the wide sole and heavier clubs going into year two. I was looking for a club with higher trojectory which I am receiving with the Di7. I was a W/S guy in the 60's and happy I returned. I like these irons at address which conveys confidence. I like the fat shaft with no hosel and solid feel. I have really accepted the wide sole and design of this club. This low cost set of irons will be with me for some time as see no difference in having a $500.00 with my game. Only complaint is the finish on these irons are not the best and mark easily. Perhaps later model has finish that stands up to scuffs. |
[Jan 11, 2009]
marinedad02
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Wilson Staff Di7
I have always struggled with my irons. Over the years, I have owned Titlelist 704 OS, Ping G5's, and most recently G10's. Then I read the reviews and "traded down" to the Di7's. Its light night and day...I can swing easier, and the ball travels farther, and more consistanly down the middle. I have only demo them, and play one round with my new set, but let me just say that I can now hit my 7 iron as far as I use to could hit my G10 5-iron. Call it more confidence or just plain better engineering, but something changed when I changed my irons. I think its the UST Proforce graphite shafts. They are lighter and the bend (torque) just suits my swing better. I sincerely recommend this to any mid to high handicap player with a slower swing speed who is looking for an improvement in their iron play. Oh, did I mention the price tag...New Di7's off eBay for $300. Half the price of the big boy irons.(I still use my G10 driver and fairway woods...they are still the best!) Customer Service Hope I never need them! Similar Products Used: Titleist 704 OS, Ping G5, Ping G10 |