Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Drivers
Cleveland QUADPRO Titanium Drivers
[Jun 29, 2003]
Don
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Adams Redline Driver
Since I am a bogy golfer I don’t write reviews regarding golf. But, I just have to praise the new Adams driver. I found that it is very forgiving and easy to hit. Anyone that has trouble off the tee box, or wants to start using a driver off the tee instead of their three wood, should take a look at this club. I don’t have the skill to work the ball (draw or fade) but I am able to tee the ball high and hit it high (with the wind) or tee the ball low and hit drives that hit the fairway and roll & roll (against the wind). My good drives are 240-260 yards and my bad drives (now) are 180-200 yards - and in play. Due to its large head and sweet spot, the club helped me the most on my average and poor shots. The club works for me. Customer Service I have not needed customer service. Similar Products Used: none |
[May 09, 2003]
Michael Roberson
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Quadpro 10.5 driver
This driver crushes the ball everytime I hit it. Weighted perfectly,this club flows when you swing. |
[Apr 28, 2003]
Dave
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Quadpro Ti Driver
I have had this club in my bag for the last two years, And I still love it. I cannot justify buying a new driver at a price of $200 or more. I was just reading the reviews and see that not many people have reviewed the quadpro in the last couple of months. It I were a mid to low handicapped player I would buy this club for less than $50. You can save the same # of strokes and spend a whole lot less. It can be hit a ton, and straight! |
[Feb 24, 2003]
mindonfire
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Quadpro Prototype Beta
I LOVE this club! It is virtually identical to the regular Quadpro. I love the setup, as the club head is more traditionally shaped than many out today. I am able to control the ball flight: trajectory, draw and fade fairly easily compared to other similar drivers. Cleveland has married the accuracy and feel of the traditional drivers with the distance and explosiveness of the modern big boys. This is not the longest driver ont he market and I know that statement alone will turn many people off. However, don't write off accuracy and workability and feel so quickly...particularly when this club CAN hit the ball a long way. I have hot a number of drivers and have about a 4 or 5 right now. I have not hit anything but this one for a year now and I am very happy with it. I am also hitting atleast 2 or 3 more fairways a round! Pros: Look, Feel, Accuracy, Sound, control... Cons: Not the longest Driver (but not far from it. YOU and your swing may be the deciding factors there.) Customer Service N/A |
[Dec 11, 2002]
Rich
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Quadpro Titanium Stiff Shaft
I bought this club the season before last and was very impressed. The one problem I found was that it lacked distance compared to the other drivers out there, but distance is somthing I really didnt need. It is the most accurate driver I have ever hit, in my last round this season I hit 13 fairways. On average I hit around 10 fairways with it. I would suggest this driver to anyone who is looking for superior accuracy off the tee and is looking to lower scores. Similar Products Used: Callaway: Hawkeye VFT, C4(good), Warbird, Ping Ti, Titleist: 975D, 975J(good), Orlimar Hip Ti, Cleveland Launcher. |
[Nov 17, 2002]
Nick Abba
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
quadpro driver 8.5 degreess/s flex
It's great I can carry the ball 220 mrters and get 20 meters of run.Awesome into the wind and doesn't balloon! |
[Nov 14, 2002]
alexzanen
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Quadpro Ti 10.5'
I was using a Kasco Power Tornado Ti with 45.5inch A flex. It was long, but the whippy flex was making me slice 70% of the time. Was looking to cure the slice with a better club, so I researched a lot, and read reviews abt the Quadpro and decided to try it before getting a newer Launcher. So, i got a 10.5' with Proforce 65 R shaft, 44 inch. honestly, i wasnt too overly impressed with the QP, distance-wise that is. the ball was flying straight, but didnt fly as high as i wanted, unlike the kasco. the ball flight was boring, which i didnt need because we dont have gutsy winds at this part of the world. however, there was noticeable improvement in accuracy. i was hitting damn straight, or good draws 80% of the time, which is very good by my standard. however, i was disappointed with the loss of distance by abt a good 30%, at the point of landing. i m not sure how for the roll carries though. (i usually hit the range at night). overall, i would say this club would bring my scores down because eventhough theres loss of distance, i was more accurate off the tee. well, maybe it needs more time at the range. plus, i havent yet whack it on the course. I am seriously thinking of reshafting it to a 43 inch bimatrix (due to good reviews coupling it to the QP). ABout the subject of feel, with the shaft, it feels muted and dull, but high with substance. it feels meaty. unlike most japanese titatinum that feels empty and loud. I guess I was just expecting much more given the rave reviews the QP receive here and i think i just need to spend more time to get to know this animal. Customer Service didnt have to use it Similar Products Used: Kasco Power Tornado, Adams, Cubic Balance, Orlimar, |
[Aug 30, 2002]
Steve
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Quadpro Ti with Stiff Bimatrix
I used to use a Callaway GBB 8 degree. I had it for about 4 years and I hit about 240 to 260 using the Top Flite XL2000 Aero( I play mostly municipal golf courses and consequently don't need a softer ball). I have always played a power fade and whenever I tried to squeeze a long drive out of my GBB, I would flirt with a slice. It is a great club but not very forgiving due to the loft ( I have hit 9 and 10 degree GBB's and they are a noticeably straighter). After reading all the positive reviews for the Quadpro Ti, I went out and got the 9.5 with the Bimatrix shaft. I have played with it 3 times using a Titleist NXT Distance (it's very possible that I will hit a little longer once I get some more XL 2000 Aeros or XL 3000 Feels) ball and thought I would come back and give you my impressions. Let's get the bad news out of the way. If you are already hitting around 250, this club is not going to add another 25 yards magically. The ball just doesn't come off the face as hot (on average)as it would if you were hitting for example the Callaway VFT Ti. I have been averaging around 255-260 with the Quadpro Ti only bc I have been taking some big swings. When I hit my old GBB at around 75% (required to keep the ball straight/5-10 yd. fade), I would average around 245. The same swing with the Quadpro will take me out to only around 235 yds. But the good news, nay, the great news about the Quadpro Ti is that although I am swinging the club at around 85%, it goes dead straight. I know for a fact that a couple of shots I hit during the last round should have faded about 15 yards (I know my swing pretty well) but to my utter surprise the ball stayed straight and in the fairway. That's the kicker about this club. If you have a fundamentally sound swing, you can take a bigger swipe at the ball and gain more control. The only bad shots that I have had with the Quadpro Ti were tentative swings that resulted in fades and meager distance. Get this club. For $100 bucks, it is absolutely a steal. It is definitely straighter. Just don't expect to hit 280 with the same swing that gets you 250 now. Customer Service Haven't had occassion to call them. Similar Products Used: Callaway GBB 8 degree, TM Original Ti 9.5 degree, ERC II, Calloway Hawkeye VFT |
[Aug 27, 2002]
T Lim
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Quad Pro Titanium
The appearance of the club is very nice. I like the solid feel and sound of the club when striking the ball. The sound is a nice, not too loud, not too soft ping. I found this club to hit very long and straight. It is extremely forgiving in that if you hit it fat/ thin it often will still fly straight. I find the stiff graphite shaft to be perfect for me since my swing speed ~100. For the price that I paid, I was pleasantly suprised with the quality of the club and the extreme forgiveness of it. I would this club to anyone who is looking for a good value driver. Customer Service Excellent service from Ebay dealer. |
[Aug 09, 2002]
nanook
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Quad Pro Ti 9.5
Had slicing problems. Read reviews here last year, seemed like best bet for affordable driver. Goes far. Stays in fairway. I can grip and rip it or just let it swing. May not be the absolute longest, but I can be confident of carrying more than 200 on any hit. On the screws it gets me out well past 250. Oh, and did I mention the fairway? High percentage. My mentor just got a Deep Red. On his good hits he can outdrive me by a few short yards, but I'm in the fairway much more often. I can't tell about workability 'cause I'm not there yet. The best thing is the confidence I have from the consistency and accuracy. Strategy, not fear, is the only reason to keep it in the bag. Great deals since discontinued. Customer Service Never tried. Similar Products Used: Warbird; Black Plasma Ceramic; |