Cleveland Launcher Titanium Drivers
Cleveland Launcher Titanium Drivers
USER REVIEWS
|
[Nov 03, 2001]
enragedgolfer
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland 10.5
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None This driver is unbelievable. I just switched to it from the TiSI (a fine club by the way), but the Launcher beats the pants off of it in all ways: looks, distance, trajectory, everything! In the particular loft I got the club in, trajectories are mid to high, flat, and penetrating. When you catch one flush, it feels great and soars through the air, hits the ground hard and rolls. Forgiveness is very notable too, particularly towards the toe. The shots still go straight and suprisingly far. I didn''''t know a club this good could exist. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Nov 03, 2001]
Duke
Scratch Golfer
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Launcher
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Pretty much one of the straightest drivers I''ve ever hit. I try just about everything that comes down the pipeline and this club is up there with the best. One thing about this club is that it hit a little high for me(8.5 stiff). It was also a little difficult to work the ball. But hey can''t really complain about hitting a straight shot. Distance wise, I think is a little less than the clubs I''ve played with(300S,Ping TISI,975J) due to the high ball flight but not my much. I think if it was a 7.5(which I don''t think is made) the distance would have been about the same. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Nov 03, 2001]
Rick ODonnell
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Launcher
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None All I can say is HOLY COW. (expletive prefered, but this is a family site). I have been using a Taylor Made Burner for the last couple years and was very happy withthe distsnce I was getting. On a whim I purchased a Launcher while in a golf shop helping a friend pick out new driver. I had been reading about the ERC II for a while and the guy inthe shop recommendedthe Launcher. I can''t express how much I LOVE this driver. I am getting EASILY 40-60 yards more than my Burner. I ust knock the cover off the ball. And I am not trying to overpower the ball like I normally had to do to get good distance with the Burner. And the club is toed in about 2 degrees which has completely eliminated my slice. Absolutely worth the $299 I paid for it. This is going to be a VERY popular driver. Thank you Cleveland. Great work! Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Nov 02, 2001]
bsoblack
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Launcher
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None recently switched from Taylormade 320 to the Cleveland Launcher 9.5. No comparison. The Launcher is further, more solid, and straighter.. Not even close. And, over 100 dollars cheaper. This club will soon be hottest club around. Similar Products Used: Ping Isi Titaniaum, Titleist 975d, callaway hawkeye, calaway GBB, Taylormade 320 and Firesole. |
|
[Nov 01, 2001]
bdare72
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Launcher 9.5
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Went down to the golf shop to get a deal on a 975D for $279 before they were all gone, but the pro suggested I try the Launcher which was new and just $20 more. Boy, glad I did. I have only hit it in the simulator, but I hit shots much straighter than the 975D and a little longer. Club looks great at address, doesn''t look as big as it really is. Very large sweet spot too. Can''t wait to try it out on the range and on the course. The large head on this driver may not allow shots to be easily shaped but I now have the confidence to just bomb it straight down the middle! This club is for real, try it! Customer Service Too early to tell Similar Products Used: Taylor Burner Bubble, Ping, Titleist 975D, Callaway Hawkeye |
|
[Nov 01, 2001]
Bill
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Launcher Driver
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Very Impressed with its performance, looks & price. I''ve tried everything in my hunt to replace my 7 year old TM. I found all the newer clubs perform about the same. They all have the latest technology so for me it can down to some personal factors "price", "feel" & "looks". For me the Launcher won in all the categories so it was an easy decision. Similar Products Used: TM 320, VFT, 975J, PING TISI, ORLIMAR |
|
[Oct 31, 2001]
Dave
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Cleveland Launcher 10.5
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Can''t say enough good things about this driver! Please do youself a favor and try the Launcher before you settle on anything else. Two of my friends didn''t, and ended up paying $200 more for the ERCII, and they can hit my Launcher farther and straighter. Similar Products Used: Taylomade 360, Ping TISI, Orlimar HipTi, Callaway ERCII, Wilson Big Red |
|
[Oct 30, 2001]
SKIPGDSTL
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
LAUNCHER
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None WOW! AS LONG, OR LONGER THAN ANYTHING CURRENTLY ON THE MARKET! AS STRAIGHT AS THE DEEP RED. GREAT FEEL. FUJI SHAFT. LOOKS A LOT SMALLER THAN ITS ACTUAL 330 C.C. SIZE. WHAT MORE CAN YOU WANT IN A DRIVER? I TRADED A 9.5 OUT OF 10 CONDITION 975J FUJI FOR THIS STRAIGHT UP, AND I KNOW I GOT THE BETTER OF THE DEAL! CAN''T WAIT TO TRY THE THREE WOOD! THANK YOU CLEVELAND! Similar Products Used: 975J, TISI TECH (YES, I''VE HIT IT.),VFT, ERC II, DEEP RED, HIP TI, 300,320,360, QUADPRO TI, TISI, YOU NAME HER, I''VE BANGED HER. |