Nike Nike Tour Accuracy Balls
Nike Nike Tour Accuracy Balls
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 01, 2024]
nadya
Strength:
This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d Weakness:
` ` ` |
[Aug 12, 2007]
Kevin Chen
Shoots in the 90s
This is one of the most high quality balls in nike golf. It has a soft feel off the driver and has a good spin within a 100 yard shot. It is a good ball for putting, it makes it easy to putt. But it is easily scraped,... But i still like it. |
[Nov 12, 2006]
gremboul
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Nike Tour Accuracy
For me a 3 piece ball is a must (inner shell). I like this ball because it feels like the long version of a Pro V1. My personal preference is to optimise the short game (control & Spin). an extra 10 yards off a drive is less important compared to a ball that reacts well to a wedge. For iron shots I prefer a ball that gets up in the air easy and quick (ie alot of spin). Hitting into the winds takes a knock down shot... The soft cover on this ball makes it a winner. Scuffs will happen on any ball made to spin due to the soft cover. At 10$ mint on the internet these are worth it. I would pay a little more new if they were still marketed. Customer Service good Similar Products Used: pro V1, HX Tour, Topflite Strata, Maxfli, Topflite Balata |
[Jul 27, 2005]
Denis
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Nike Tour Accuracy TW
My goodness. This is quite a group of reviewers, all seem to be in the 70's and 80's!! If balls could only talk!!!! Anyway, an excellent ball, especially for the price. Nike, like the rest, has moved on to "better, longer, straighter, etc..." This ball is currently a great buy. Like another reviewer, I too am always a "generation" behind, so I can hit great balls at a fraction of their original price. |
[Nov 16, 2004]
clydem1
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
tour accuracy
Excellent ball. I am a 4 handicapper and shot a 68 with this ball career best. Bought a dozen at sam's clubs for 14.99 WHAT A DEAL! Sam's had the DD'S for the same price I tried them also again WHAT A DEAL! Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: U TRI TOUR GREAT BALL, BOTH PROV1'S U TRI BETTER FOR ME. |
[Aug 21, 2004]
rf053
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Tour Accuracy
Recently I found the regular Nike Tour Accuracy at Samm’s club for $14.99 per box thanks to the fact that Nike has just introduced the Nike One. I use to mock the fact that golf companies introduce new clubs, balls, etc. every year these days, now I just sit back and pick their bones when they are overstocked with last year’s product. The Nike Tour Accuracy is really a very fine golf ball. It is soft, and provides good response around the greens due to a nice amount of spin. I’ve read some reviews that say it is shorter than other balls...nonsense...as always...the swing is the thing... In fact, today on a couple of iron shots I over clubbed because I thought it would be shorter, only to smile and find that it was not. On 18 I hit the longest drive I have ever hit on that nasty par five, leaving me to debate... do I go for it or not? I did...and it did. Side by side with the Pro V1 there was no difference, except for the fact that the Nike Tour felt softer on wedge shots and stopped within a foot of the landing spot without excessive spin... Oh, yeah, it also costs many dollars less. At the current reduced prices this ball is well worth stocking up on before they are all gone. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Titleist Pro V1. Strata Tour Ultimate. |
[Dec 25, 2003]
chris walsh
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
Tour Accuracy
Great Ball. As these have been superceded by the "one", got these at a great price new. Have since gone on Ebay and am getting AAA premium balls for a quarter of the new price. Ball is very Long off the tee, I have guys at my club who cannot believe the distance I am getting with a 3 wood and think I am using driver. I like a soft ball and have no complaints here. It really is an excellent ball. I am looking forward to trying the Tour Accuracy TW which is marginally harder. Price I quoted is Australian Dollars which is about 28 us dollars Customer Service na |
[Aug 05, 2003]
Dan
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Nike TA
At my level, I need softer balls with a lot of feel. I had heard about these, so when I saw them on sale, I picked up a dozen. I have used Pro V1s and the Callaway CTU-30 Blue also, and performance wise, this ball compares well. It probably has the softest cover of the three. It really sticks around the greens and gives good confidence on testy little pitches and chips. The problem with this is that it wears out very quickly. Being a low 80s shooter, I don't make perfect contact all the time, and one mis-hit or a couple crisp wedges, and your new, expensive Nike is scuffed beyond usefullness. That being said, it is a very playable ball, but does not suit my game. Titleist Pro V and Callaway CTU are much more durable. I have also more recently tried Maxfli A3, and this ball has promising perfomance for someone of my skill level. Provides enough soft feel around the greens and is still tough enough to handle my misses. Plus, it's a LOT more affordable. Customer Service Never needed Similar Products Used: Pretty much everything |
[Jun 11, 2003]
NAFLACK75
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
TA2-LNG
I generally shoot in the low to mid 80's, so i understand that i am not the level of player that a scratch golfer is. That being said; different do play differently, some are slightly longer and some spin more. I usually play the HXred, Hogan, or M3. They are fairly long with adequate spin, my favorite being the HX. I would say that the TA2-LNG is not quite as long as the above mentioned, but it spins quite a bit more. Unfortunately i am not looking for a ball that backs up when struck with an 8 iron, and when you factor in that my driver is what keeps me from being in the 70's - i don't wnat any more spin. Not a bad ball, others are more fitting to my strengths. I must say though that these are durable balls, no shredding. Similar Products Used: ProV1(too hard), HX Red(#1), Hogan, M3 |
[May 02, 2003]
hartl
Shoots in the 70s
The tour accuracy's are by far my favorite golf ball. Over the last few years, and my game has improved drastically, I've undergone a transition from the type of player that couldn't care less about balls (infact I was known to simply steal balls from the driving range and use them on the course), to the type of player that bought cheap packs on sale (Top Flite, Pinnacle, etc.), to the type of player that refused to play anything but Titleist, Callaway, or Nike. Now that I'm basically a +8 or so golfer, I've learned what a ball can do, and I really only play these days with either the Tour Accuracy or the Tour Accuracy TW (depending on the course conditions). Callaway's I dislike the most out of the three big brands I play mentioned above, primarily because they deteriorate very quickly. After one round of normal play they will show the signs of wear that a Nike ball will shows after 5 rounds and a Titleist ball will show after ten rounds. I also think both the Callaway models, firm and soft, are both too unresponsive--on drives I can't feel where I hit the club face to know why my shot went where, and on putts this same dull sensation occurs. Titleist's I like (particularly the Pro V1) because they last longer than most any other balls on the market, and because they are quite responsive--you have a communication going on between you, your club, and the ball, so that you know where you hit the ball, where the ball hit the clubface, and because this shows you why balls fly where and how long, it can be a game improvement. Titleist's I find almost too responsive however, and I long for the buttery feeling of Callaway's. Then along came the Nike line-up. My highest compliment to them is that they are neutral balls. Do they last the longest? No. Do they cost the least? No. Will they drastically improve your game? No (neither will any balls for that matter). But they have the perfect combination of feel and responsiveness. Generally, the father a ball is designed to go, the worse they feel, no matter what club you're using. For example, play a hole with a Pinnacle extreme titanium distance--off the driver, irons, wedges, and especially the putter, they feel like you're rolling a metallic ball--they have no feel and no response. Sure, they'll fly a long ways, but wait until you get on the green and you'll be sorry. Spin balls generally feel nice and soft off both the driver and putter but fall short off the tee. Nike's fly nearly as far as a dedicated distance ball, spin like a spin ball, and feel like a fantastic ball! Soft, responsive, confidence-builders...even if they don't lower your handicap, they'll sure make golf a more fun game and will enhance any round. The more I've played golf and learned about golf and the more I appreciate the game, the more the ball I play matters to me. I now really only use Nike balls. And if you're playing on a windy day, or on a very hilly course, or on a day where the weather isn't average, try the Tour Accuracy TW's--a little bit firmer feel, less spin, and lower boring trajectory for great wind results. Similar Products Used: I've probably tried every ball out. |