Wilson Staff Tour Blades Irons

Wilson Staff Tour Blades Irons 

DESCRIPTION

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 92  
[Apr 01, 2024]
nadya


Strength:

This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d

Weakness:

` ` `

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Jan 01, 2024]
minami


Strength:

Wonderful Article!
tstoto
tstoto
tstoto
tstoto

Weakness:

. . .

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Dec 27, 2023]
arissaaqila


Strength:

Consider the overall durability of the Tour Blades. Evaluate how well they hold up over time, including the durability of the clubhead finish and shaft. by tstoto

Weakness:

No weaknesses. All very good.

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Apr 28, 2018]
hostlund


Strength:

Very precise. tiny some may say so they make you concentrate om keeping your head still. The stiff shafts are much more fkexible than some of the modern ones which allows you more playability

Weakness:

You have to sacrifies distance from accuracy

Price Paid:
USD 450 (4-PW)
Purchased:
New  
Model Year:
2008
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Aug 06, 2017]
Jim Rutherford
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Wilson Staff Tour Blade Fg17

On my second set of tour blades over the last 35 yrs. Wore out the grooves in first set and seemed to hit the same. Found 2nd set ( 1-SW) for $45. I'm58 yrs old and will probably play these till I die. Nothing beats the feel and trajectory of a well struck shot. Plus easy to hit draws and fades wonderful club

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 16, 2013]
herbsewell
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Wilson Staff Tour Blades (late 70's to early 80's)

These clubs are awesome. I bought my set about a month ago at a garage sale. I paid 20.00 for them. The lady I bought them from said that they were women's clubs. That was when I said, "Was she Betsy King?" She the previous owner was a 4 handicap. They were all dusty and all they needed was to be cleaned off with new grips. They already have helped me hone my swing. I shot 81 with them today. The heads are is such good shape, the shafts are the originals, and they are still very consistent. Sweet spot is the size of a dime. The yardages are about 2 clubs shorter than my MP 29's. But now I don't have to hit my 9 iron 150 anymore. These feel like butter when you pure one. I hit my 2 iron about 220 on a par 5 and got on in 2. I wish that I got these irons when I was a kid. Better late than never.

Customer Service

Hey Wilson, what you did to Karen Stupples is reprehensible.

Similar Products Used:

Mizuno MP 29's

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 11, 2012]
John Gilbert
Shoots in the 90s
Model Reviewed: Wilson Staff Fg 17

I am 43 and have been playing for 3 years. I realize that playing a classic forged blade is not necessarily a good idea in most's opinion. Consequently I absolutely love these clubs. I have a set that ranges 1-PW. The 1 iron travels 220-240 off the tee for me when my driver and swing let me down. When I hit one pure it is like butter. The hardest habit for me learn is a smooth swing. Although I am still a high handicapper I plan on continuing with these classics.

Similar Products Used:

Titleist Tour Model

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 28, 2011]
michael timney
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed: wilson staff fg17 tour blade

THESE ARE BY FAR THE BEST FORGED BLADES TO MADE IN MY OPINION.I PURCHASED THEM BACK IN THE 80'S AND LOOKED GREAT THEN AND STILL LOOK BETTER THAN THOSE OUT ON THE MARKET TODAY.
IF YOU WANT TO WORK THE BALL MORE WITH THESE CLUBS ITS NO PROBLEM,HOWEVER BECAUSE OF ITS SMALL SWEET SPOT(APPROX SIZE OF A 20P PIECE)THE ARE VERY UNFORGIVING.BUT WHEN YOU HITTING THE BALL WELL THEIRS NO CLUBS BETTER OUT THEIR TO MATCH THEM.
YES THEY MAY HAVE BEEN DESIGNED 30 YEARS AGO AND HAVE BEEN COPIED BY OTHERS BUT NEVER BETTERED.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 01, 2011]
ripit35
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Wilson FG-17 tour model

These are by far the most unforgiving clubs i ever hit, which is why i purchased them. I want to improve my ball striking. In my experience with forgings, these are right up with the 1032 carbon steel offerings from Mizuno and Snake Eyes. Pure shots require hitting down on the ball, sweeping it will result in a heavy feeling at impact with a loss of distance. As far as workability, i can hit a 15 yard fade with the pitching wedge no problem. These clubs are 30 years old and still look fantastic.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 05, 2010]
jetdriver
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Wilson Staff FG17 2-SW

Great set of sticks. Good looking, good hitting, great feel. Long irons are a dream of the tee. The sand wedge is so good from turf that I rate it right up there with my favorite Cleveland 900 gun metal wedge (with PATRIOT golf-pride grips...of course).

Customer Service

-none

Similar Products Used:

Hogan: Apex PC's, Grinds, Radials, Apex II, Hagen Ultras,

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 92  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

golfreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com