Titleist 909H Fairway Woods
Titleist 909H Fairway Woods
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 01, 2024]
nadya
Strength:
This article is truly amazing! I am very impressed with the depth of insight presented and the clear and easy-to-understand writing style. The content of the article is very relevant and informative, providing a deeper understanding of the topic discussed. In addition, the analysis presented is also very profound and provides a different perspective. Thanks to the writer for the effort and dedication in presenting high-quality articles like this. I am looking forward to reading more articles! Read more on: Arta4d Weakness:
` ` ` ` |
[Jan 02, 2024]
minami
|
[Sep 02, 2010]
UFtoner
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 909H
I purchased this to replace a 3 iron (~225-230 yd range). After going to Edwin Watts, they informed me that they didn't have a demo to hit, so relying on reviews I purchased it anyway. I am beyond satisfied with my purchase. I hit the ball high, so I was afraid about losing distace. however, this club is the perfect balance of height and power. I am able to get it up quick and land it soft while keeping my desired distance.It is a bit more pricey than other hybrids out there, but it's well worth it. |
[May 03, 2010]
4spitz
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
909H
Purchased a 909H to replace 3 iron. Switched all my equipment from Ping to Titliest, and this Hybrid is easier to hit than the Ping G10, although I am a 4 handicap so it should be easy I guess. This club sits very square, no offset to speak of which provides confidence at set up. Titleist has did a nice job here as the ball explodes off the face. Mid handicapers can hit this club easily.
Customer Service Not used, but when ordering Titleist is VERY VERY slow to fill orders. Similar Products Used: Ping G10 |
[Oct 06, 2009]
phikapopp
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 909H 21*
I've been unable to even look at a hybrid since their inception, but since I'm playing less and less recently, I am struggling with hitting any irons longer than a 4.
Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: Ping i15, Taylor Made R7 |
[Jul 14, 2009]
slw0266
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
909H 17*
Bought 17* with voodoo regular shaft, absolutely sweet. Long mid trajectory, perfect for long par 4's and not so long par 5's. Certainly not difficult to hit for mid handicapper such as I. Good build quality and performance. Customer Service never used. Similar Products Used: burner hybrid, G10 & Rapture hybrids. |
[Jul 01, 2009]
jbone1109
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
909h 19*
I bought this club so i can go for the pin when i'm 235-250 yds away and not fly the green with my 3 wood. It definately filled my gap and the feel is undescribable. It is very easy to work the ball and has enough forgiveness on slight miss hits to still keep you handy. It's a little pricy but is worth the money for its quality. |
[Jun 22, 2009]
Trus
Shoots in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 909H Hybrid
This club is not for a mid to high handicap player (9 or lower)... It sits square and has very little offset (forgiveness) and can be easily hooked with an aggressive swing... with that said like every hybrid I have ever played it just takes a little practice and getting use to.
Customer Service Only issue is at $200 dollars retail there should not be an up charge for shafts.
Similar Products Used: Nike, Taylormade, Cobra, Mizuno |
[Jun 21, 2009]
31648
Scratch Golfer
Model Reviewed:
Titleist 909H 21* and 24*
I included these in my new set replacing the 3 & 4 irons. I went with the Diamana 80 stiff shaft. These are so good I'll probably never hit another 3 or 4 iron again. But you never know. Both clubs get the ball up in the air and distance is very consistent. Customer Service Very nice Similar Products Used: Hogan CFT, Cleveland Halo, Cobra, Sonartec |