Cleveland Quadpro Fairway Woods

Cleveland Quadpro Fairway Woods 

DESCRIPTION

USER REVIEWS

Showing 81-90 of 103  
[Aug 15, 2000]
Leighton Carroll
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Cleveland Quadpro 9.5 w/EI-70 S

I was looking forward to hitting this club after reading some of the reviews and boy, was I disappointed. I have a TM Ti-B2 Forged 8.5 w/S-90 and the difference is both in distance and in accuracy. The smaller head is less forgiving, harsher feeling, and produces noticably less distance (15y). On the plus side, the ball flight was good - nice and medium-low. I picked the club up for $100 used and was disappointed anyway.

Customer Service

I broke the head off of my VAS Ti a couple of weeks ago and got a tersely worded email to my reply.

Similar Products Used:

Taylor-Made Ti Bubbles - 1 & 2, Callaway Steelhead, Cleveland VAS Ti. I also carry RTG wedges which are excellent.

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
3
[May 19, 2000]
Scott
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Cleveland Quadpro 15*, 19*

I really dig these woods. The distance is phenomenal, the head size is nice and compact, and I know where I hit the ball on the face. I wasn't too thrilled with the shafts, so I put Grafalloy 45+ in them, which made them perfecto!

Customer Service

None to speak of.

Similar Products Used:

Callaway Steelhead, Steelhead Plus, PRGR 200i, Taylor Made Burner, Titleist 975f

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 05, 2000]
Kevin
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: 17 & 22 Loft

Outstanding clubs. Ball jumps off of the face. Better than average distance. Can be found for around $189.00 for graphite shafts. One of the best values in golf.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 25, 2000]
R. Langley
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: Cleveland QuadPro 15 Degree Steel Shaft Stiff

The Cleveland QuadPro is, in my humble opinion, the best all around fairway wood. I’ve demoed or played the Orlimar TriMetal Plus, PING i3, Titleist 975F, Callaway Steelhead, and Callaway Steelhead Plus. The TriMetal Plus with EI-70 (not available in steel shaft) has a dead feel and is hard to get the ball up. The PING i3 (steel shaft) is a solid club but not outstanding in any aspect, including distance or forgiveness. The Titleist 975F (steel shaft), including the new supposedly fixed 2000 version, although beautiful, is unforgiving and not as long as the other clubs mentioned above. The Callaway Steelhead Plus with its variable face technology actually has a smaller sweetspot than the original Steelhead, scratches easily, and still comes with that flimsy, low-quality, proprietary Memphis-10 steel shaft. The original Steelhead is an excellent club, second only to the QuadPro, but after caving in the face of two, I’ve given up on Callaway quality. Also, if you tend to draw the ball, the very closed club face can easily result in hooks.

The QuadPro fairway woods are now available in steel shaft, and oh, what a difference it makes. And it’s not some cheap proprietary shaft like the Memphis-10; it’s a True Temper Lite. With the new steel shaft, it’s long, easy to hit, great feel, and very forgiving. I also love the square face. I hit my 15-degree 3 wood longer AND straighter than any other fairway wood currently available. Good job Cleveland!

Similar Products Used:

Callaway, PING, Titleist, Orlimar

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 26, 2000]
David
Shoot in the 90s
Model Reviewed: Quad Pro Dual Rail 16º

At long last, the club I've been hoping for: the length of a 3 wood with the reliability of a 7 wood off the grass. The face is not too shallow so it is very good both off the tee and from the first cut of rough.

Similar Products Used:

Adams, Armour, Goldwin, Honma, Taylormade, Zevo

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 16, 2000]
Ron
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: 10.5 degree regular

I used to drive maximum 230 yards, with this club im hitting consistently over 245. I get great accuracy and the feel you get with this driver is unbeilevable. The SuperSteel had a dull thud when hitting the ball and a higher price tag. The ball jumps off the face. I love it so much i think im going to buy the 13 degree 3 wood.

Similar Products Used:

Taylor Made supersteel

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 15, 2000]
Hadley Ma
Shoot in the 80s

Very responsive and accurate. Love this club. Can hit from almost anywhere.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 15, 2000]
Hans Wimmer
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: 8.5 driver, 13 & 17 degree fairway woods

I've tried a lot of drivers and fairway woods the last five years. I bought the fairway woods first and can't say enough about them. They're long, straight, you can hit them high, low, draw, fade. I've birdied 4 of 6 par fives the last two times out. (If I could putt, they'd be eagles.) In those rounds I added the driver. I've outdriven guys I never could before (used a 975D the last 18 months) and hit 18 of 21 fairways. I have the stock stiff graphite shafts and grips and wouldn't change them at this point. (Tried a pro-force shaft in the 975). These clubs are as good a bargain as you'll find in golf today. I'm ready to try their forged irons. (I already use the Cleveland wedges)

Similar Products Used:

Titliest 975D & F, Orlimar, Cobra, Callaway, Taylor Made

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 14, 2000]
Paul Suid
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed: 13* Threewood

Great looking club. When hit squarely, the ball takes off. Not great on mis-hits. The graphite shaft is a little too lightweight for me. After reading some of the other reviews, I'll have it reshafted with a good steel shaft and try again.

Similar Products Used:

Callaway Steelhead, Taylor Made Tour Spoon

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
4
[Aug 08, 2001]
Lou Kelso
Shoot in the 100s
Model Reviewed: Quadpro #4

Excellent wood. Forgiving but hard hitting. Gave me 20 plus yards right off. Craftsmanship is outstanding and aesthetics are quite pleasing. My only complain has to do with the headcover which is not long enough which means the shaft will receive more bag wear.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 81-90 of 103  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

golfreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com