TaylorMade 320Ti Series Drivers
TaylorMade 320Ti Series Drivers
|
[Jun 18, 2001]
Ron
Shoot in the 80s
Demo'd club (with TM R-80 shaft) both on range and actual play and thought it the answer to my prayers except for the occasional high fade. Bought same but the more I used the club the worse the performance; particularly the high fade problem. Upgraded shaft to Graffaloy Pro-lite regular and reduced the fade tendency somewhat. Only way to get decent performance is to minimize backswing to about 3/4 and slow way down. Can occasionally get the great distance others talk about but performance is too inconsistent for me. For some reason, this club and my swing are not compatible. Similar Products Used: Mizuno, Callaway Hawkeye |
|
[Jun 17, 2001]
Andrew Yelanich
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
TM 320 8.5 w/EI-70 stiff
I HATE HATE HATE this driver. I used to play a Titleist 975D 8.5 which i loved. It was longer and straighter than the Taylor Made. Im gettin rid of this driver asap. Im gettin a Titleist 975J or Mizuno Pro 300s. Its not me its the clubhead. I hit both the D and The TM next to each other. The D which is supposed to be hard to hit is a peice of cake to launch straight as an arrow. The TM hits 30 yds less with a bad sclice. Do Not Get This Driver. I hit a ping knockoff 3 wood with a DG X-100 10yds further. I hit my D at least 10 yds longer. The whole Spring affect is a bunch of bull. At the course i look for a hole to use my D but the Tm satys in the bag the whole round. Oh yeah the variables are the exact same, the shaft on the D and Tm are EI-70 the D plays stiffer cause of the bore thru so i tippe dthe TM 1 in. The grips are both Golfpride V-50 cord and the loft are both 8.5. This was the biggest letdown sofar, because i can usually make things work but i just hate this club. But to each his own. Similar Products Used: Titleist 975D 8.5 w/EI-70, Pacifica fairways Cryo driver |
|
[Jun 15, 2001]
GGS
Shoot in the 80s
Whoever says that this club is not forgiving must not know how to hit a ball. I have never had a club with the feel, sound, distance like this club. Some people expect a ballon on a stick, I just expect a club that will perform and let me get a lot more out of my good shots. This club will do it. I dont see why somebody cannot get past 150 when I am driving them 250 yards CONSISTANTLY. I guess its the swing. Different clubs suit different swings. This club certainly suits my swing. Taylor Made has hit the bullseye with this club. I would rate this club MORE than 5 stars if i could! Customer Service none yet Similar Products Used: Callaway GBB (Great club, but dead compared to the TM) |
|
[Jun 15, 2001]
Gus
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
TM320, 9.5* w/ BiMatrx
What a great club! Very long, mid-high, straight trajectory. Not necessarily the club for people wanting to "work" the ball (see the 300), but if you can live with the longest, straightest drives of your like, try it. FYI, I'd strongly suggest a premium shaft suited to your swingspeed, tempo and ballflight. In my case, BiMatrx is awesome. Similar Products Used: QuadPro Ti, Orlimar TriMetal Plus, 975D |
|
[Jun 15, 2001]
Michael
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
320 8.5 deg Reg flex Lite
I was at a Taylor Made demo day today. This is the best club I have ever hit. My misses are heel and toe, and with this club the ball still went a long way. This club being the same length shaft as my current driver is 20 yards longer. If the price was $150 cheaper I would own one right now, but at $400 I will live without owning one. Similar Products Used: ECR |
|
[Jun 10, 2001]
Aloysius
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
taylor-made 360 ti driver
tried it out at a demo day. believe me, you will definetely not want this club! the head was too large to play properly and it isn't very forgiving. for those with higher club head speeds, avoid this club like plague! only when played softer you may hit further. maybe it's just me coz i could barely reach 150m while my dad could drive past the end of the range. Similar Products Used: taylor-made burner adams tight lies sc driver |
|
[Jun 05, 2001]
Roy Vargas
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
320 and 260
These are ok drivers. I don't see why people are raving about them. The face seems to help the golfer who can't hit the sweetspot horizontally. If you hit off the toe or heel constantly then this is your club. My problem tends to be vertical inaccuracy. A little thin, a little high on the face. THe clubhead is NOT TALL SO THOSE KIND OF MISHITS REALLY SUFFER WITH THE 320. i tRIED THE 360 AND IT FEELS TOO FIRM at impact. Real blocky feeling. I had a mizuno that was real soft when you hit it flush. Neither of these clubs deliver that sensation. Very stiff faces. They both do a good job of correcting errors except for the up and down ones. I really like the head shape of the VFT but it is a terrible club. Maybe the new Titleist J will be good. If I ever see one. Taylormade should redesign a players version of the 320 with a taller face and not so much draw bias. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jun 04, 2001]
Bill Garrett
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Taylor Made 320 ti
Definetly the most forgiving driver out there. Not as long as the VFT or Mizuno Ti but much more accurate. If a person is struggling with fairways off the tee this is the driver for you. Similar Products Used: Calloway VFT, Mizuno Ti, Adams SC N, Calloway Steelhead. |
|
[Jun 28, 2001]
Greg
Shoot in the 80s
Gee after the 320 became a separate review area, i see all these mixed reviews. there is no excuse for people to not like this club. It is unbelievable. I decided after months of haveing the 320 i tested it against my GBB. 320 won wholeheartedly. Although the GBB is a great club, the 320 wins in every level: feel, distance, sound, etc. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Jun 25, 2001]
Jeff Owens
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
Taylor Made 320Ti Series Driver
hudge off the tee. great feel. very forgiving. by far the best Customer Service its great Similar Products Used: callaway vft, titlest 975d |