TaylorMade 300 Series Drivers
TaylorMade 300 Series Drivers
|
[Sep 05, 2001]
Rooster
Shoots in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
300ti
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Taylor Made has hit the jackpot. Not only are the tour players winning with this driver, and loving it, but amateurs are too. If the pros feel that the 300, 320 is fit for their game..then so follow the amateurs. This driver is worth the retail price suggested. Forgiving...what ...hit it high on the face and your drives will carry to unchartered territory. I have gained 15 yards from the same tees, and the same ball. Add a new hi tech A10 or V1, and lookout. Better put a flight attendant on your ball. Compared to the new J, the 320 ti is the best , time after time for distance and accuracy. Could you ask for anything more. CW Similar Products Used: I have in my bag a 15 degree fairway club. The Fujikura Protoype 70x shaft give you consistently lower piercing ball flight What a one 3 punch. Accurate and it hits bullets with tremendous feel. B |
|
[Aug 14, 2001]
Jeff
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Hawkeye, VFT, Deep Red
AMAZING!! I pick this 8.5/ust proforce 65 stiff from the used club rack at golfsmith and am now converted from my Hawkeye to Talormade. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Aug 14, 2001]
Glenn Tappenden
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
Taylor Made 300
I demoed this and it came down to this and it came down to this and th ping. The Ping is more forgiving so i went with it,. this a nice club. this or the ping rules Similar Products Used: Ping Tisi |
|
[Jan 08, 2001]
gary shing
Shoot in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
320 9.5" S-90
I agree with Eric. Take a look at nick's and tim shiway's reviews. Both of them were written at almost the same time. Both saying ping and callaway are better. Was this coincidence or was it the same jerk fooling around on this website? Be civilised, use this website properly! Similar Products Used: Titleist 975D, Olimar Plus Driver, Callaway Hawkeye, Callaway Steelhead, Taylor Made Supersteel, Mizuno 300S, Bridgestone X500 |
|
[Jan 17, 2001]
Tim
Shoot in the 80s
I took my 975D driver to a golf store/simulator and had a club maker review my swing etc. After hitting about 20 drives he than tapped up 3 drivers in the store and had me start hitting each driver. Long and the short of it was I didn't even know what clubs I was swing. Total truth. Turns out I was using the new VFT, TaylorMade 300, and a custom club. After looking at launch conditions etc., I choose the best club for me and it turned out to be the Talormade 300. It was 30 yrds. longer than my current 975D. I took 20 plus swings with my 975D and average 235. The Taylormade had lower launch conditions and gave me an average of 268. I couldn't believe it. Sure the 975D will be longer for some people, but for my swing the Taylormade was clearly the club. Similar Products Used: Ping Tisi, 975D |
|
[Jan 08, 2001]
Eric
Shoot in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
320 Ti 9.5 R-80
Whoever just posted the last three reviews is full of bull. Its way too obvious he is just trying to bring the TaylorMade rating lower. Regardless, the 320 Ti is easily one of the finest drivers available. I play a GBB 10* prolite 35+ and the 320 is easily 5-10 yards longer and more forgiving. The stock lite shaft is great, I actually prefer it over my prolite. Everything about the 320 is great: trajectory, distance, forgiveness. The Ping's are nice but the stock ping shafts are garbage. 975s are nice but not as forgiving. If the 320 Ti is garbage like the last few posters seem to believe, why is it the number one driver on tour? Don't take the negative reviews seriously. Go out to a range and try the new TaylorMades out yourself. I'll bet you'll realize they are easily one of the best, if not the best driver around. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: GBB, BBB, Ping Tisi, 975, Hawkeye |
|
[Mar 05, 2001]
mikkel wallentin
Shoot in the 80s
Model Reviewed:
360
what happend to the beauty in golfclubs. This club is so big that I also find it hard to get the right tempo. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Mar 05, 2001]
sonja nymand
Shoot in the 90s
Model Reviewed:
320
It was a loy more hard to hit than I thought. I also tried the 360, but it didn't really help. Similar Products Used: None |
|
[Feb 28, 2001]
Ben Beeler
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
300 series 9.5 tour s-90
This Club is great, very long, longer than the Biggest, the reviews on here said the 300 was not to forgiving well i disagree very forgiving because i hit a few toe shots didnt go as long but not short and was also straight. In all i really like this 300 i would recommend it. It is a Great Club. Similar Products Used: Hawkeye, Biggest Big Bertha, Ping, Titelist, |
|
[Feb 22, 2001]
Jim Ivey
Shoot in the 70s
Model Reviewed:
320 with 9.5 loft and stiff shaft
I've been playing a Titleist 975D with a Prolite Stiff for the better part of a year. The driver has been great. I never thought I would switch. I've been a loyal Titleist man for quite a while playing DCIs, 962's and now 99's. A friend purchased a 320 and let me hit it at the range. WOW..... I killed the ball. I'm a fairly big guy that has never had a problem with distance. Accurracy is another story. With my 975D I had a tendancy to snap one every once and a while. I would take the ball out 75 yards and turn the left blinker there it would go. I hit my buddies club off of nearly every par four and five at Poppy Hills on Saturday and just killed the ball. On a couple holes I hit my 975 as a head to head. I REALLY wanted to say my Titleist performed as well, but I can not. After banging my head against my desk for three days I pulled the trigger and purchased a 320. I went the driving range to hit a small bucket convincing myself it would not work as well due to the fact I owned it now. WRONG, long and down the middle. I've NEVER been a Taylor Made fan.... I now have a Taylor Made Driver in my bag with Titleist printed down the side !!! Similar Products Used: Callway VFT & Titleist 975D |